Difference between revisions of "User talk:Maud"

From Howtopedia - english
Jump to: navigation, search
(Another attempt to connect)
(Salut)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
Best regards,
 
Best regards,
 
--[[User:Curtbeckmann|Curtbeckmann]] 14:56, 10 April 2007 (CEST)
 
--[[User:Curtbeckmann|Curtbeckmann]] 14:56, 10 April 2007 (CEST)
 +
 +
==Hi again==
 +
Hi again, Maud.
 +
 +
Thank you so much for the very prompt reply, and my apologies for this delayed response.  Two things happened.  I went on vacation the same day I left my last note, and I forgot to set up the "watch this page" on my user pages, so I didn't realize that you had replied.
 +
 +
Anyway, I am very encouraged by your response!  I think there is a lot that we can accomplish as a united team, instead of the various duplicated effort that I'm sure we are currently doing...  When you get a chance to review with the rest of your team, let me know how it goes.  If email might be a better format for this conversation, I can be reached at curtbeckmann (at) appropedia (dot) org.  Otherwise, I'm going to watch this page, and my two user page and talk page, so you can reply at any of those if you prefer.
 +
 +
Best regards,
 +
--[[User:Curtbeckmann|Curtbeckmann]] 00:31, 23 April 2007 (CEST)

Revision as of 00:31, 23 April 2007

salut, c'est quoi cette page?

Cette page, c'est pour me laisser des messages.

Salut

Mais, je ne peu pas parler francais.

Hello, Maud. Please pardon me for being a pest. I dropped an email recently about Appropedia, to see if you might reconsider the possibility of collaboration. Although both of our sites are doing fairly well, I'm sure that we could accomplish much more together. We are in the early stages of a major expansion, which will probably take several months. See http://www.appropedia.org/OpenSustain-Appropedia_Launch_Document for more information. Of course I understand that the mission described in the document is somewhat different from the Howtopedia mission. It is also different from (at least bigger than) the original Appropedia mission. But I believe that this larger mission will have a strong positive impact on the world, in part because it will engage a much larger audience.

One challenge that we face is a relative lack of wiki savvy folks, such as yourselves. We are also not as multilingual as we would like to be.

Although both Howtopedia and Appropedia are seeing good activity, it's also clear that there is relatively limited collaboration and extended contribution going on. We have recognized that one way to expand that significantly is to integrate a forum / message board. (Look at SustainabilityForum.com, which in three months has a larger user base than either of us. Think of how the strengths of wikis complement the strengths of forums. We approached them, but they prefer to remain independent for now.) We will be integrating forum functions soon as part of our expansion, and we expect to engage a much larger audience, and help them begin to collaborate.

You will notice from the link I provided above that the name of the new project may not be Appropedia. The team that approached us was using a different working name. If you were to consider joining the project, it would be on equal terms with the other team members. Howtopedia, Appropedia and "Sustainapedia" (their working name) could all be considered equal partners, particularly since a new name will be used. You at Howtopedia, and we at Appropedia, can clearly see the value of the work that we are doing. We can both imagine a large and active site, providing useful information on how improve lives sustainably. In my view, the world will be better served by a single such site, rather than two sites competing for viewers and content, overlapping in many ways and duplicating effort. Is it important what the site is called, or who gets credit? To me, no. I created "WinWinWiki", then let it go to join another wiki. Several other wiki founders have also decided that collaboration is the key and joined Appropedia. Perhaps other wiki founders have joined Howtopedia. Is there someway that we can collaborate in a big way?

Please consider joining us as we work toward this new site. Please help us to define it and make it grow and serve the world.

Best regards, --Curtbeckmann 14:56, 10 April 2007 (CEST)

Hi again

Hi again, Maud.

Thank you so much for the very prompt reply, and my apologies for this delayed response. Two things happened. I went on vacation the same day I left my last note, and I forgot to set up the "watch this page" on my user pages, so I didn't realize that you had replied.

Anyway, I am very encouraged by your response! I think there is a lot that we can accomplish as a united team, instead of the various duplicated effort that I'm sure we are currently doing... When you get a chance to review with the rest of your team, let me know how it goes. If email might be a better format for this conversation, I can be reached at curtbeckmann (at) appropedia (dot) org. Otherwise, I'm going to watch this page, and my two user page and talk page, so you can reply at any of those if you prefer.

Best regards, --Curtbeckmann 00:31, 23 April 2007 (CEST)